Did we hear someone mention that their
Vista PCs either won't boot or that the systems simply keep cycling
through the boot sequence without pause? Are the reports of computers
from “way back” in December 2007 not working correctly actually
true? What if the computer systems that your company relies on for
its very survival were—are?!—using this reportedly cutting
edge operating system to...well...operate? If you manage tech systems
acquisitions and the systems you paid good money for do not work
correctly, who do you suppose will take the immediate and
job-threatening heat: you or Microsoft?
"I can still hear the MS rep on the
phone a couple years ago when she told me, 'We do not take
unsolicited suggestions from the public.' And, yes, she
specifically told me it was OK to quote her. Does anyone consider
customer needs over corporate profits anymore?"
Gregg
Keiser's article in ComputerWorld contains the following
downright scary quote from Microsoft's Vista program manager, Nick
White in the MS Vista blog, "So far, we've been able to
determine that this problem only affects a small number of customers
in unique circumstances...” (From The Network!: “We sure
hope that your company isn't one of those unique companies.”)
White goes on to say: “Microsoft has
not yet produced a fix for users whose machines either won't boot or
reboot constantly.” (From The Network! “Because, if you
are a Vista user with “issues”, you've probably been living with
systems that simply refuse to boot for over three months. Of course,
that won't impact your company bottom line, will it?”)
If you are an information technology
asset manager (ITAM or TAM), this unfortunately common “type” of
new operating system defect report should serve as a serious
heads-up. There is another perspective of the article above HERE
by Trisha Leibert at TechRepublic. You should read it. When it
comes to technology asset management or enterprise asset management
(EAM), your abilities to clarify to executive management why your
company isn't playing with the latest and greatest tech toys could
easily spell doom or boom for both you and your company. Read on for more...
If these issues haven't hit you yet—but
especially if they have—you need to begin collecting credible
reports of the goods, the bads, and the uglies relating to the Vista
operating system. Use these reports as elements of your cost/benefit
analysis and conceptual time schedule for a possible Vista upgrade.
You do conduct CBAs or business case analyses, don't you? If
you can't establish that there is a seriously compelling business
case for acquiring this product (or any other IT product) then
do not make the purchase.
“By the way, Microsoft pulling XP, or
any other operating system, off the market is not a
valid criteria for moving to Vista. It may, however, be a perfectly
credible prompt for you to start looking for alternative operating
systems.”
One of the key reasons that the average
company looses significant revenue within the IT budget is that very
few companies tend to complete a thorough, unbiased, business case
analysis (BCA) prior to initiating a tech purchase. While large
corporations can frequently absorb the bumps and grinds of
scrap-tech, small companies can easily be slapped right out of
business when their “tech advantage” turns out to be a budgetary
black hole.
Picture a company with seven computer
systems that was “forced” to buy only Vista systems because our
friends at MS would only provide that operating system to the local
suppliers. Is anyone keeping honest track of the losses to SMEs
(small to medium sized businesses) that are being caused by
constantly tweaking operating systems and software containing
defective code?
Maybe we all should... Because, until
we do—and until the global business technology consumer acts upon
this knowledge, we will continue to be force-fed technologies that
just plain should not have been placed on the market.
I'm Alan Plastow and The Business
Technology Consumer Network—The Network!—is your
vendor-neutral ally in filtering out vendor hype and bringing solid
value back into the your technology asset management (TAM)
investments.
|