Dispite what the hardware chip producers are telling you, multi-processor computer systems aren't such a new idea.   Unfortunately for you, the potential impact on your bottom line isn't something you'll hear discussed at your local Starbucks.  I think we could all agree that packing multiple processors into a computer can improve performance, but effective asset managers need to make themselves aware of the pitfalls. Quite frankly, multiple processors--whether separately configured, or nestled on a single main chip--could easily run into some hefty (and frequently nicely hidden) surcharges when it comes to licensing the operating system or software.

Admittedly, computers containing more than a single processor can improve performance and we are all well aware that they cost more in terms of initial investment.  However, we also need to be aware that other elements of the given system will frequently need to be more powerful (read expensive) to be fully compatible with the multi-processor.

For example: the new Core Duo chips from Intel fit two processors on a single traditional chip.  This duo chip does, indeed, provide significant speed and functionality increases, but they come at a price.  In the case of a duo system running on Windows Vista, users will need to add a more powerful graphics card to cash in on many of the improvements.  For example: A beefed up graphics card will require the notebook computer to be larger—to provide room in the case for the more powerful card.  This means that size and weight of notebooks will both increase.

Further, what do you suppose is one of the key functions that most of us look for in a notebook computer?  Could it be increased battery life?  Don’t plan on it with your new multi-processor-equipped notebook.  Powering up and constantly using that high end graphics card will pretty much say bye-bye to that formerly long-life battery.

Let’s see…  We’re paying more for the system.  We’re paying more for beefed up graphics cards.  We will most likely be hefting larger and heavier notebook systems through airport security and up into that overhead bin.  Oh, yea.  Nearly forgot, we’re also losing battery time.  Are these good things?

Granted multi-processor systems are not for everyone.  However, as asset managers from around the world have told me, these new toys will quickly become status symbols for power users and executives.  Trust me—whether you want them or not—you will be getting multi-processor systems in the near future.

Oh, by the way, did I mention that some pretty popular software packages are available with multi-processor licenses?  Did I mention that if you have a multi-processor system and do not have the operating system or software licensed accordingly you could very easily be out of compliance?  Did I mention that, since multi-processor systems are so powerful, you’ll pay more for those licenses?

As usual, am I nuts?  Out of line?  On target?  What are your thoughts?  You DO have thoughts, don’t you?  Are you an asset management spectator or a participant?  Speak up and let me know what you think.